MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213190183 · doi:10.1701/3748.37311

Active and green city project: l’urban health in pratica

2022· article· en· W4213190183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecenti Progressi in Medicina · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Obesity Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrbanizationPhysical activityBusinessEnvironmental planningEnvironmental healthQuality (philosophy)Economic growthQuality of life (healthcare)Political scienceMedicineGeographyNursingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urbanization is one of the leading global trends of the 21st century that has a significant impact on health. Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), are the result of a combination of genetic, physiological, environmental and behavioural factors. These diseases are related to rapid unplanned urbanization, unhealthy diets and a lack of physical activity. This report presents a project (Active and green city project) that wants to rethink the city in terms of health and sustainable quality of life. The first objective is the implementation of physical activity and sustainable nutrition to improve the health of citizens by strengthening the cultural identity of the city. The project aims to be a practical response to the various call to actions of the scientific societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it