MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213204584 · doi:10.26552/com.c.2004.3.28-30

Evaluation of pavement friction according to european standards

2004· article· en· W4213204584 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ján Čelko

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkid (aerodynamics)SlovakPavement managementEngineeringIndex (typography)Forensic engineeringEuropean standardInternational Roughness IndexMechanical engineeringCivil engineeringTransport engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pavement friction was measured in Slovakia by SKIDDOMETER BV 11. An evaluation of skid resistance by Mu index value for use in the Slovak Pavement Management System (PMS) is based on one parameter of friction, only. The tendency to adapt the Slovak PMS to European standards involves creation of criteria for the skid resistance evaluation by International Friction Index IFI. The Slovak SKIDDOMETER BV11 did not participate in the PIARC harmonisation experiment for pavement friction measurement. Therefore the new approach for IFI calculation was required. The PIARC experiment and concerned equipment were analysed in detail. The British Portable Tester TRL was chosen as subsidiary equipment depending on Canadian experiences. The new methodology for IFI calculation by the Slovak SKIDDOMETER was suggested depending on comparison measurements and experiences analyses. On the base of new methodology criteria for pavement skid resistance evaluation were created.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications - Scientific letters of the University of ZilinaSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207