Feasibility of a Bi-national Consulate-based Teleophthalmology Screening and Referral Protocol for Diabetic Retinopathy among Mexican Migrants in the United States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate a bi-national consulate-based teleophthalmology screening service for diabetic retinopathy (DR) among Mexican migrants in the U.S. METHODS: Adult visitors (n=508) at Mexican consulates in California with self-reported diabetes underwent questionnaires and fundus photography. Photographs were graded for DR by retina fellows in Mexico via teleophthalmology. Participants were contacted with results and provided referrals when necessary. RESULTS: Nearly all (97.6%) participants were aware that diabetes can cause vision loss. One-quarter (24.4%) had undergone an eye examination in the past year. Barriers to care were cost (53.9%) and insurance (45.6%). Most (85.4-91.1%) reported that Spanish-speaking providers and provision of screening in primary care would increase participation in screening. Any DR, vision-threatening DR, or proliferative DR were found in 30.2%, 9.9%, and 5.4% of participants, respectively. Nearly one-fifth (19.5%) received referrals. CONCLUSIONS: Screening in Mexican consulates may improve DR detection and treatment among Mexican migrants in the U.S.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".