MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213208821 · doi:10.1101/2022.02.18.481080

Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2

2022· preprint· en· W4213208821 on OpenAlexafffund
T. Reid Alderson, Iva Pritišanac, Đesika Kolarić, Alan M. Moses, Julie D. Forman‐Kay

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthMedizinische Universität GrazHospital for Sick ChildrenKarl-Franzens-Universität GrazUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
KeywordsFolding (DSP implementation)Computational biologyConditional independenceIntrinsically disordered proteinsProtein foldingProtein structureFunction (biology)Structure functionComputer scienceBiologyPhysicsGeneticsArtificial intelligenceBiophysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The AlphaFold Protein Structure Database contains predicted structures for millions of proteins. For the majority of human proteins that contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which do not adopt a stable structure, it is generally assumed these regions have low AlphaFold2 confidence scores that reflect low-confidence structural predictions. Here, we show that AlphaFold2 assigns confident structures to nearly 15% of human IDRs. By comparison to experimental NMR data for a subset of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold (i.e., upon binding or under other specific conditions), we find that AlphaFold2 often predicts the structure of the conditionally folded state. Based on databases of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold, we estimate that AlphaFold2 can identify conditionally folding IDRs at a precision as high as 88% at a 10% false positive rate, which is remarkable considering that conditionally folded IDR structures were minimally represented in its training data. We find that human disease mutations are nearly 5-fold enriched in conditionally folded IDRs over IDRs in general, and that up to 80% of IDRs in prokaryotes are predicted to conditionally fold, compared to less than 20% of eukaryotic IDRs. These results indicate that a large majority of IDRs in the proteomes of human and other eukaryotes function in the absence of conditional folding, but the regions that do acquire folds are more sensitive to mutations. We emphasize that the AlphaFold2 predictions do not reveal functionally relevant structural plasticity within IDRs and cannot offer realistic ensemble representations of conditionally folded IDRs. Significance Statement AlphaFold2 and other machine learning-based methods can accurately predict the structures of most proteins. However, nearly two-thirds of human proteins contain segments that are highly flexible and do not autonomously fold, otherwise known as intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). In general, IDRs interconvert rapidly between a large number of different conformations, posing a significant problem for protein structure prediction methods that define one or a small number of stable conformations. Here, we found that AlphaFold2 can readily identify structures for a subset of IDRs that fold under certain conditions (conditional folding). We leverage AlphaFold2’s predictions of conditionally folded IDRs to quantify the extent of conditional folding across the tree of life, and to rationalize disease-causing mutations in IDRs. Classifications : Biological Sciences; Biophysics and Computational Biology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207