MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213213297 · doi:10.2741/1074

Arousal systems

2003· review· en· W4213213297 on OpenAlexafffund
Barbara E. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsNeuroscienceBasal forebrainLocus coeruleusReticular activating systemWakefulnessTegmentumThalamusBrainstemReticular formationForebrainArousalSensory systemRapid eye movement sleepBiologyPsychologyCentral nervous systemMidbrainEye movementElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The brain contains autochthonous neural systems that evoke waking from sleep in response to sensory stimuli, prolong or enhance arousal in response to special stimuli, and also generate and maintain wakefulness regardless of sensory stimuli during the active part of the day. Through ascending projections to the cortex, these arousal systems stimulate cortical activation, characterized by high frequency gamma and low frequency rhythmic theta activity, and through descending projections to the spinal cord, they stimulate muscle tonus along with sensory-motor responsiveness and activity. They are comprised of neuronal aggregates within the brainstem reticular formation, thalamus, posterior hypothalamus and basal forebrain, and they utilize multiple different neurotransmitters. Within the brainstem, neurons of the reticular formation, which predominantly utilize glutamate as a neurotransmitter, stimulate cortical activation by exciting the widespread projecting neurons of the nonspecific thalamo-cortical projection system, which similarly utilize glutamate, and neurons of the ventral extra-thalamic relay systems located in the posterior hypothalamus and basal forebrain, many of which also utilize glutamate. In addition, these systems have descending projections by which they can enhance or modulate muscle tonus and activity. Articulating with these are cholinergic neurons of the ponto-mesencephalic tegmentum and basal forebrain that promote cortical activation during waking and also during rapid eye movement sleep (REMS), in association therein with muscle atonia. Dopaminergic ventral mesencephalic neurons stimulate a highly motivated and positively rewarding state during waking and may also do so during REMS. In contrast, noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons promote an aroused waking state and prevent REMS as well as slow wave sleep (SWS). Serotonergic raphe neurons promote a seemingly quiet or satiated waking state, which though exclusive of REMS, can actually be conducive to SWS. Histaminergic neurons of the posterior hypothalamus act like noradrenergic neurons in enforcing waking and are joined by neurons in the region that contain orexin, a neuropeptide recently shown to maintain waking and in absentia to be responsible for narcolepsy, or the inability to maintain wakefulness. These multiple arousal systems are grossly redundant, since no one system is absolutely necessary for the occurrence of waking; yet they are differentiated, since each plays a special role in waking and sleep. During SWS, they are submitted to an inhibitory influence arising in part at least from particular GABAergic neurons co-distributed with many neurons of the arousal systems and also concentrated within the basal forebrain and adjacent preoptic region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1330.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations529
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207