Changes in subchondral bone structure and mechanical properties do not substantially affect cartilage mechanical responses – A finite element study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subchondral bone structure has been observed to change in osteoarthritis (OA). However, it remains unclear how the early-stage OA changes affect the mechanics (stresses and strains) of the osteochondral unit. In this study, we aim to characterize the effect of subchondral bone structure and mechanical properties on the osteochondral unit mechanics. A 3-D finite element model of the osteochondral unit was constructed based on a rabbit femoral condyle μCT data and subjected to creep loading in indentation. Trabecular bone volume fraction, subchondral bone plate thickness, and equilibrium modulus were varied (including experimentally observed changes in early OA) to characterize the effect of these parameters on the osteochondral unit mechanics. At the end of the creep phase, the maximum principal strain at the bone surface of the cartilage-bone interface was decreased by 50% when the trabecular bone volume fraction was reduced from 48% to 28%. The maximum principal stress at the same location was decreased by 36% when plate thickness was reduced by 100 μm (-31%). In cartilage, small changes in the mechanics were seen near the cartilage-bone interface with a considerably thinner (-31%) plate. The changes in trabecular bone volume fraction, subchondral bone thickness and plate equilibrium modulus did not substantially affect the cartilage mechanics. Our results suggest that experimentally observed changes that occur in the subchondral bone structure in early OA have a minimal effect on cartilage mechanics under creep indentation loading; clear changes in the cartilage mechanics were seen only with an unrealistically soft subchondral bone plate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".