Pre-training graph neural networks for link prediction in biomedical networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Graphs or networks are widely utilized to model the interactions between different entities (e.g. proteins, drugs, etc.) for biomedical applications. Predicting potential interactions/links in biomedical networks is important for understanding the pathological mechanisms of various complex human diseases, as well as screening compound targets for drug discovery. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been utilized for link prediction in various biomedical networks, which rely on the node features extracted from different data sources, e.g. sequence, structure and network data. However, it is challenging to effectively integrate these data sources and automatically extract features for different link prediction tasks. RESULTS: In this article, we propose a novel Pre-Training Graph Neural Networks-based framework named PT-GNN to integrate different data sources for link prediction in biomedical networks. First, we design expressive deep learning methods [e.g. convolutional neural network and graph convolutional network (GCN)] to learn features for individual nodes from sequence and structure data. Second, we further propose a GCN-based encoder to effectively refine the node features by modelling the dependencies among nodes in the network. Third, the node features are pre-trained based on graph reconstruction tasks. The pre-trained features can be used for model initialization in downstream tasks. Extensive experiments have been conducted on two critical link prediction tasks, i.e. synthetic lethality (SL) prediction and drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction. Experimental results demonstrate PT-GNN outperforms the state-of-the-art methods for SL prediction and DTI prediction. In addition, the pre-trained features benefit improving the performance and reduce the training time of existing models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Python codes and dataset are available at: https://github.com/longyahui/PT-GNN. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".