A Potential Game Approach for Decentralized Resource Coordination in Coexisting IWNs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To meet the requirements of various emerging manufacturing applications, multiple Industrial Wireless Networks (IWNs) are employed to operate in the same region. However, the limited communication resources inevitably incur interference in the time and frequency domains, which is known as the coexistence problem. Existing centralized mechanisms suffer from a low computational efficiency in a large-scale network scenario, and the globally shared information cannot be fully obtained in practice. To this end, we first design an incomplete information sharing protocol to clarify the decentralized coordination among coexisting IWNs. We then formulate the coexistence problem as a non-cooperative game, which is proven to be a potential game. In addition, considering the deterministic deadlines of data transmissions in industrial applications, we propose a Deadline-aware Incomplete-Information-based Decentralized Resource Coordination (DIIDRC) algorithm. We also mathematically analyze that the DIIDRC algorithm converges to a collision-free optimal schedule in a resource-sufficient scenario or a nearly-optimal schedule in a resource-insufficient scenario. We conduct extensive simulations to verify the effectiveness of the DIIDRC algorithm. Evaluation results show that the DIIDRC algorithm has obvious superiorities over existing works in terms of the convergence rate and schedulable ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it