MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213262755 · doi:10.4028/p-ktk508

A FEM Analysis on the Influence of Manganese on Carbon and Chromium Macrosegregation in Large Size Steel Ingot

2022· article· en· W4213262755 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelhalim Loucif, Chunping Zhang, Jean-Benoı̂t Morin, Mohammad Jahazi

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIngotMaterials scienceChromiumManganeseMetallurgyAusteniteCarbon fibersFerrite (magnet)Carbon steelFinite element methodMicrostructureComposite materialThermodynamicsCorrosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, 3D numerical simulations were performed to study the effect of Mn on the macrosegregation behaviors of carbon and chromium in a 40 MT steel ingot using Finite Element Modeling (FEM). Two Mn contents of 0 and 5 wt.% were investigated. Thermophysical properties such as specific heat, density and phase fractions were determined using thermodynamic software Thermo-Calc®. Simulation results indicated that higher Mn content increases the carbon macrosegregation while it tends to lower the one of chromium. Moreover, it changes the solute poor band into rich one in the case of chromium and no bands were obtained for carbon. These results are analyzed in terms of the changes of thermophysical properties, interactions between alloying elements and the change in the primary solidification mode from δ-ferrite to austenite resulting from the increase of Mn concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207