MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213264000 · doi:10.3390/rs14040879

ClassHyPer: ClassMix-Based Hybrid Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Imagery

2022· article· en· W4213264000 on OpenAlexaff
Yongjun He, Jinfei Wang, Chunhua Liao, Bo Shan, Xin Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationRobustness (evolution)Artificial intelligenceData miningMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by the tremendous success of deep learning (DL) and the increased availability of remote sensing data, DL-based image semantic segmentation has attracted growing interest in the remote sensing community. The ideal scenario of DL application requires a vast number of annotation data with the same feature distribution as the area of interest. However, obtaining such enormous training sets that suit the data distribution of the target area is highly time-consuming and costly. Consistency-regularization-based semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods have gained growing popularity thanks to their ease of implementation and remarkable performance. However, there have been limited applications of SSL in remote sensing. This study comprehensively analyzed several advanced SSL methods based on consistency regularization from the perspective of data- and model-level perturbation. Then, an end-to-end SSL approach based on a hybrid perturbation paradigm was introduced to improve the DL model’s performance with a limited number of labels. The proposed method integrates the semantic boundary information to generate more meaningful mixing images when performing data-level perturbation. Additionally, by using implicit pseudo-supervision based on model-level perturbation, it eliminates the need to set extra threshold parameters in training. Furthermore, it can be flexibly paired with the DL model in an end-to-end manner, as opposed to the separated training stages used in the traditional pseudo-labeling. Experimental results for five remote sensing benchmark datasets in the application of segmentation of roads, buildings, and land cover demonstrated the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach. It is particularly encouraging that the ratio of accuracy obtained using the proposed method with 5% labels to that using the purely supervised method with 100% labels was more than 89% on all benchmark datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207