MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213272829 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.181

A182 THE LACK OF CHROMOGRANIN A IMPACTS COLONIC EPITHELIAL CELLS MARKERS IN AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL OF ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2022· article· en· W4213272829 on OpenAlexaff
Diane M. Tshikudi, Nour Eissa, A. Diarra, Jean‐Eric Ghia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromogranin ABarrier functionMucinColitisUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseLGR5MedicineImmunologyPathologyInternal medicineBiologyImmunohistochemistryDiseaseCell biologyColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic and acute inflammatory disorder of the colon linked to dysregulated gut mucosal immune response and compromised colonic epithelial barrier function and integrity. Chromogranin-A (CHGA), a pro-peptide secreted by enteroendocrine cells, is highly expressed in colonic tissues of patients with UC. Elevated CHGA has been shown to correlate with UC disease activity and severity. Moreover, complete deletion of CHGA was shown to result in a diminution of pro-inflammatory markers known to disrupt the colonic epithelial barrier function and gut mucosal healing process. However, little is known about the effect of the absence of CHGA on colonic epithelial barrier function and gut mucosal integrity. Aims Here, we characterized the impact of the lack of CHGA on the colonic mucosa and epithelial barrier structure and function using CHGA knockout (CHGA-/-) mice treated with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to induce colitis. Methods 13–17 weeks old male C57BL/6 wild-type (CHGA+/+) and C57BL/6 CHGA-/- mice were treated for 5 days with 5% DSS to induced acute colitis, control mice received regular water. CHGA mRNA expression, disease activity index (DAI), and macroscopic score (MS) were analyzed. Distal colonic tissues were isolated, and mRNA expression of markers associated with regenerative stem cells (fast-cycling stem cells [Lgr5+] and reserve stem cells [HOPX+] and [LY6a+], Goblet cells functions mucus barrier mucin 2 [MUC2], resistin-like molecule β [RELMβ], WAP 4-disulphide core domain 2 [WFDC2]) and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) was evaluated by qRT-PCR. Results We validated a beneficial effect of the Lack of CHGA on colitis severity, associated with significantly lower DAI and MS. In colitic CHGA+/+ and CHGA-/- mice, Lgr5+ and HOPX+ were both highly down-regulated, although, compared to CHGA+/+, CHGA-/- mice presented a 10.5fold higher expression of HOPX+. Compared to non-colitic states, Ly6a+ expression was significantly elevated in both colitic CHGA+/+ and CHGA-/- mice, however, no differences in Lgr5+ and Ly6a+ expression were noted between CHGA+/+ and CHGA-/- mice in all conditions. In CHGA+/+ mice, inflammatory conditions led to higher MUC2 and RELMB expression, although, compared to CHGA+/+, these markers were significantly lower in CHGA-/- mice. In colitic conditions, compared to CHGA+/+, CHGA-/- had a significant increase of WFDC2. In non-colitic conditions, mRNA expressions of all markers evaluated between CHGA+/+ and CHGA-/- in this study were unaltered. Finally, no differences were observed in TFF3 gene expression. Conclusions These results indicate in the absence of CHGA, the colonic epithelial barrier integrity and function are maintained through the modulation of goblet cells functions and elevated gut mucosa regenerative potential, thus enhancing the mucosal protection to colitis damage. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies→French-language works237,207→