Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pada kebijakan kampus merdeka, baik itu Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (PTN) maupun Swasta (PTS) memiliki otonomi pembukaan program studi baru. Syaratnya, PTN dan PTS harus memiliki akreditasi A dan B, serta telah melakukan kerja sama dengan organisasi dan/atau universitas yang masuk dalam QS Top 100 World Universities. Namun, pengecualian berlaku untuk program studi kesehatan dan pendidikan. Seluruh program studi baru tersebut otomatis akan mendapatkan akreditasi C. Kemendikbud juga akan bekerja sama dengan perguruan tinggi dan mitra program studi untuk melakukan pengawasan yang ketat termasuk pada kewajiban kampus dalam melakukan “Tracer Study” setiap tahunnya.Menurut saya, kebijakan pembukaan program studi baru ini sangat bagus. Seperti yang dikatakan oleh salah satu pemateri Internasional pada Webinar ISOE yang diselenngarakan oleh mahasiswa PGSD Bone tentang Kampus Merdeka, beliau mengatakan bahwa “We can learn a lot of by this new policy, Kampus Merdeka”, semoga benar adanya. Tentu saja, yang diharapkan oleh Kemendikbud pun demikian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".