La perspective des parents sur le contexte de soin et sur l’adaptation sociale de leur enfant après un séjour hospitalier : une étude par méthodes mixtes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction : A child's hospitalization can be a difficult experience for many parents and can disrupt parenting. However, parenthood in relation to this care context is little studied.Objectives : The purpose of this study is to describe the experience of parents in their relationship to the care setting and the social adjustment of children.Method : A sequential mixed-methods survey was conducted, involving 94 parents with children aged between 17 and 48 months after a hospital stay in three regions of Quebec. After completing the questionnaire, 16 participated in semi-structured interviews.Results : 1) The mothers' perceived stressors, related to care as well as the child's behavior, are associated with maternal cognitions and behaviors two months after a hospital stay.2) The parents' relationship to the care setting and the child's adaptation highlights four relational processes : continuous, difficult, ambivalent, and complex.Discussion : The care context influences the parent's ability to assume their role two months after a hospital stay.Conclusion : It is important to offer nursing to parents that takes into account the psychological dimension of parenthood and the social adaptation of children to the care context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".