MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213276530 · doi:10.1101/2022.02.16.22271088

Penetrance and Pleiotropy of Polygenic Risk Scores for Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Depression in the VA Health Care System

2022· preprint· en· W4213276530 on OpenAlexaff
Tim B. Bigdeli, Georgios Voloudakis, Peter B. Barr, Bryan R. Gorman, Giulio Genovese, Roseann E. Peterson, David Burstein, Vlad I. Velicu, Yuli Li, Rishab Gupta, Manuel Mattheisen, Simone Tomasi, Nallakkandi Rajeevan, Frederick Sayward, Krishnan Radhakrishnan, Sundar Natarajan, Anil K. Malhotra, Yunling Shi, Hongyu Zhao, Thomas R. Kosten, John Concato, Timothy J. O’Leary, Ronald M. Przygodzki, Theresa Gleason, Saiju Pyarajan, Mary T. Brophy, Larry J. Siever, Grant D. Huang, Sumitra Muralidhar, J. Michael Gaziano, Mihaela Aslan, Ayman H. Fanous, Philip D. Harvey, Panos Roussos

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionNational Institutes of HealthOffice of Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsBipolar disorderSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychiatryMedicineClinical psychologyDepression (economics)Genome-wide association studySchizoaffective disorderPsychologyPsychosisSingle-nucleotide polymorphismMoodGeneticsGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Serious mental illnesses, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression are heritable, highly multifactorial disorders and major causes of disability worldwide. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) aggregate variants identified from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) into individual-level estimates of liability, and are a promising tool for clinical risk stratification. Methods By leveraging the VA’s extensive electronic health record (EHR) and a cohort of 9,378 individuals with confirmed diagnoses of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder, we validated automated case-control assignments based on ICD-9/10 codes, and benchmarked the performance of current PRS for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression in 400,000 Million Veteran Program (MVP) participants. We explored broader relationships between PRS and 1,650 disease categories via phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS). Finally, we applied genomic structural equation modeling (gSEM) to derive novel PRS indexing common and disorder-specific latent genetic factors. Findings Among 3,953 and 5,425 individuals with diagnoses of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder type I that were confirmed by structured clinical interviews, 95% were correctly identified using ICD-9/10 codes (2 or more). Current PRS were robustly associated with case status in European (p<10 −254 ) and African (p<10 −5 ) participants and were higher among more frequently hospitalized patients (p<10 −4 ). PheWAS confirmed previous associations among higher neuropsychiatric PRS and elevated risk for psychiatric and physical health problems and extended these findings to African Americans. Interpretation Using diagnoses confirmed by in-person structured clinical interviews and current neuropsychiatric PRS, we demonstrated the validity of an EHR-based phenotyping approach in US veterans, highlighting the potential of PRS for disentangling biological and mediated pleiotropy. Funding Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) #572; Million Veteran Program (MVP-000, MVP-006); Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→