MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213288312 · doi:10.29302/ar.2021.3.2

Creștinismul ortodox în Italia: așezarea diasporelor ortodoxe din Peninsula Italiană

2021· article· ro· W4213288312 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Guglielmi

Bibliographic record

VenueAltarul Reîntregirii · 2021
Typearticle
Languagero
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeninsulaGeographyHumanitiesArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthodox Christianity in Italy: the Settlement of Orthodox Diasporas in the Italian Peninsula.According to a socio-religious perspective, Orthodox Christianity in Italy can be considered as a 'Western European Orthodox laboratory'.In this scenario, in fact, some patterns relating to the establishment of Eastern Orthodoxy in Western Europe may be identified.Taking into consideration that in Italy there is the largest number of Orthodox faithful in Western Europe and the largest Romanian diaspora in the world, I focus on the settlement of Orthodox diasporas within the Italian peninsula.The first objective is to offer an overview about the whole Orthodox community in Italy, while the second is to explore the constellation of Orthodox jurisdictions (canonical and noncanonical) in the Italian peninsula.The third aim is to define the paths of engagement with the host context of diasporas of the Romanian Orthodox Church, the Ecumenical Patriarchate, and the Russian Orthodox Church.In short, the article would like to shed fresh light on the establishment and recent sociological developments of Eastern Orthodoxy in Italy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAltarul ReîntregiriiSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207