MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213294014 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2411

White dwarf and subdwarf stars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 16

2021· article· en· W4213294014 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S. O. Kepler, D. Koester, Ingrid Pelisoli, A. D. Romero, Gustavo Ourique

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryNuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply ChainNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós AlapHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUniversity of Colorado BoulderUniversidad de AntofagastaMinisterio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de EspañaUniversité de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresBarcelona Supercomputing CenterSeventh Framework ProgrammeEarth and Life Systems AllianceUniversité de BordeauxUniversity of PortsmouthNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of UtahFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do SulH2020 European Research CouncilPennsylvania State UniversityAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaIsrael Science FoundationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaCollege of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State UniversityNew York UniversityNarodowe Centrum NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y DeporteFederación Española de Enfermedades RarasUniversity of ArizonaUniversity of TokyoCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsEntomological Society of AmericaOhio State UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaAgence Nationale de la RechercheBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeScience Foundation IrelandFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloEuropean CommissionHaridus- ja TeadusministeeriumEuropean Science FoundationUniversity of VirginiaUniversity of OxfordInstitut de Ciències del CosmosUK Space AgencyUniversity of Notre DameScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNederlandse Onderzoekschool Voor AstronomieSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoAmerican Institute of PhysicsAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyJohns Hopkins UniversityJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSEuropean Regional Development FundDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadRoyal SocietySanta Fe Institute
KeywordsPhysicsSubdwarfWhite dwarfSkyAstrophysicsStarsAstronomyBlue dwarf

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT White dwarfs are the end state of the evolution of more than 97 per cent of all stars, and therefore carry information on the structure and evolution of the Galaxy through their luminosity function and initial-to-final mass relation. Examining the new spectra of all white or blue stars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 16, we report the spectral classification of 2410 stars, down to our identification cut-off of signal-to-noise ratio equal to three. We newly identify 1404 DAs, 189 DZs, 103 DCs, 12 DBs, and nine CVs. The remaining objects are a mix of carbon or L stars (dC/L), narrow-lined hydrogen-dominated stars (sdA), dwarf F stars, and P Cyg objects. As white dwarf stars were not targeted by SDSS DR16, the number of new discoveries is much smaller than in previous releases. We also report atmospheric parameters and masses for a subset consisting of 555 new DAs, 10 new DBs, and 85 DZs for spectra with signal-to-noise ratio larger than 10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→