MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213303775 · doi:10.1109/tac.2022.3151727

A New Event-Triggered Control Scheme for Stochastic Systems

2022· article· en· W4213303775 on OpenAlexafffund
Hao Yu, Tongwen Chen, Fei Hao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Event (particle physics)Computer scienceStability (learning theory)Scheme (mathematics)Control (management)Quadratic equationStochastic processMathematicsControl systemDiscrete event dynamic systemMathematical optimizationAlgorithmEngineeringDiscrete systemStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies event-triggered control of stochastic linear discrete-time systems with discounted quadratic cost functions. A new dynamic event-triggering condition is proposed, which has simultaneously stochastic and deterministic features. The designed event-triggered control system ensures the control performance to be within a desirable level relative to that using periodic time-triggered control, while discarding the unnecessary transmissions. By adjusting the parameters, the proposed event-triggering condition can be reduced to some existing ones in the literature. It is shown that the three features (dynamic, stochastic, and deterministic) are all helpful to further increase the average interevent times. Then, the criteria in terms of the parameters are presented to ensure mean-square stability of the closed-loop systems. Moreover, an improved version of the proposed event-triggering condition is given to enlarge the minimum interevent times. Finally, numerical simulations are given to illustrate the efficiency and feasibility of the proposed results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207