MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213306896 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2022.3148207

An Optimized M-Term Karatsuba-Like Binary Polynomial Multiplier for Finite Field Arithmetic

2022· article· en· W4213306896 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplier (economics)Field-programmable gate arrayFinite fieldGalois theoryComputer scienceArithmeticPolynomial basisBinary numberFinite field arithmeticParallel computingMathematicsComputer hardwareDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finite field multiplication is a fundamental and frequently used operation in various cryptographic circuits and systems. Because of its high complexity, this operation generally determines the overall complexity and cost of these systems. Therefore, finite field multipliers and their hardware implementation have received considerable attention from researchers. This article proposes a methodology to design an efficient Galois field multiplier. First, space and time complexities for theoretical and field-programmable gate array (FPGA) implementations of M-term Karatsuba-like finite field multipliers were obtained. In addition, an algorithm was developed to obtain an efficient design based on a composite M-term Karatsuba-like multiplier. Furthermore, the proposed multipliers were verified and implemented on various FPGA devices, and implementation results were presented. Reported device utilization and latency indicated that the proposed multiplier is roughly 26% faster and 15% more efficient in the area–delay product compared to the standard Karatsuba multiplier. Moreover, comparison with state of the art also indicated that the proposed design is leading in terms of effectiveness and speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it