Bibliographic record
Abstract
C'est en septembre 2008, à la suite de discussions avec la professeure Sylvie Lauzon, qu'APORIA -La revue en sciences infi rmières a été offi ciellement lancée avec le soutien fi nancier de la Faculté des sciences de la santé et du Vice-rectorat à la recherche et le soutien technique inestimable du Service des bibliothèques de l'Université d'Ottawa.Le tout premier numéro de la revue a été publié en janvier 2009.Près de 13 ans plus tard, APORIA continue de s'imposer en tant que revue scientifi que bilingue et en libre-accès.Depuis son lancement il y a bientôt 13 ans, la revue n'a cessé de publier des textes critiques de grande qualité tant en français qu'en anglais.Pendant toutes ces années, APORIA s'est consacrée aux débats académiques en sciences infi rmières et en sciences de la santé.La formidable équipe éditoriale du journal s'est engagée à promouvoir
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".