International collaboration to develop an interprofessional diabetic foot center at Black Lion Hospital, Ethiopia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BackgroundType 2 Diabetes (DM2) is increasing everywhere and foot ulcers and amputations are a major cause of morbidity and disability. The International Diabetes Federation estimates there are 1.33 million people with DM2 in Ethiopia and 2.66 million with prediabetes. Studies in urban Ethiopia report a prevalence of 6-6.5%. The Diabetes Center at Tikur Anbessa, the largest university hospital in Ethiopia, sees 800 to 1000 patients with diabetes a week. There are no trained podiatrists or wound care specialists in Ethiopia. The Toronto Addis Ababa Academic Collaboration (TAAAC) was created in 2008 as a unique multi-disciplinary educational initiative, partnering University of Toronto (UofT), Canada with Addis Ababa University (AAU).AimsTo test whether a model for developing a diabetic foot care program used in Guyana, South America (1) would work in Addis Ababa. MethodsThe steps are: assessing system barriers to implementation of best practices, training local key opinion leaders (KOLs) and establishing a center of excellence as a focus for local education and system change.1.tNeeds Assessment: An Endocrinologist visiting Addis Ababa through TAAAC found conditions similar to those existing prior to the implementation of the Guyanese diabetic foot care program: health professionals working in silos, no comprehensive assessment process for people with diabetic foot ulcers, inappropriate use of antibiotics/dressings, patients presenting late for treatment, no systematic screening for high risk feet and poor footwear. Foot ulcers with or without gangrene was the leading cause of admission to Tikur Anbessa, accounting for 39% of DM2 patients admitted in 2010-2013 (2). Patients admitted with diabetic foot problems have unacceptably high rates of amputation (47.2%) and in-hospital mortality (21%) (3). An audit of people with diabetes seen at the Diabetes Center showed only 4.5% had had a foot exam in the last 5 years, 15.5% had previous ulcer, and 35.5% had at least one risk factor for ulceration. 2.tKey opinion leaders: Local leaders in Endocrinology and Orthopedics within the Department of Medicine, College of Health Sciences and AAU were eager to improve diabetic foot care. Medical and nursing staff was willing to be trained as KOLs to spearhead change.3.tSpace was available to establish a center of excellence in the Diabetes Center and there was a well-established training program for rehabilitation specialists. ResultsPrevention: Screening was started in the diabetes clinic using the Simplified 60 second tool.Interprofessional education initiatives and KOL team: Two endocrinologists and one nurse have been trained in wound care through the International Interprofessional Wound Care Course (IIWCC). Another endocrinology fellow and nurse started this year. In October 2016, a team from UofT consisting of an endocrinologist, wound care specialist and chiropodist visited the clinic for a week of teaching and practical training. During this week, there were 4 education sessions and 2 foot clinics attended by orthopedic staff and residents, medical residents, nurses and orthopedic nurses - close to 120 attendees. Infrastructure: Three rooms in the Diabetes Center were renovated to function as a foot care clinic through funding from the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre (UofT), which also donated offloading supplies and OR equipment.System Change: Access to rehabilitation services on site remains a challenge.DiscussionWhile it is still early, changes have been made and enthusiasm is high. Future plans include further visits by Canadian and US foot care experts for hands-on training, and visits by KOLs to overseas centers of excellence to improve practical skills. We would also like to obtain funding to train community health workers to establish centers of excellence outside the capital.References1.tLowe J, Sibbald RG, Taha NY, Lebovic G, Martin C, Bhoj I, et al. (2015) The Guyana Diabetes and Foot Care Project: A Complex Quality Improvement Intervention to Decrease Diabetes-Related Major Lower Extremity Amputations and Improve Diabetes Care in a Lower-Middle-Income Country. PLoS Med, 12(4): e1001814. 2.tGizaw, M., Harries, A. D., Ade, S., Tayler-Smith, K., Ali, E., Firdu, N., & Yifter, H. (2015). Diabetes mellitus in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: admissions, complications and outcomes in a large referral hospital. Public Health Action, 5(1), 74u201378. 3.tWondwossen A, Reja A, Amare A. (2011) Diabetic foot disease in Ethiopian patients: A hospital based study. Ethiop J Health Dev, 25(1):17-21.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.073 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".