A165 VEDOLIZUMAB IS AN OPTION TO TREAT MICROSCOPIC COLITIS IN PATIENTS DEPENDENT ON ORAL STEROIDS OR HAVE FAILED A BIOLOGIC: A MULTICENTRE CANADIAN CASE SERIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory bowel condition demonstrating normal mucosa on endoscopy, with evidence of inflammation and lymphocytosis on pathologic analysis of biopsies. The pathophysiology for this disease is largely unknown, and evidence for its management in cases refractory to oral steroids or after failing a biologic is sparse. Vedolizumab, an integrin receptor antagonist, has been used in a handful of persons with MC with limited literature. Aims Review literature on the use of Vedolizumab in treatment of MC. Present 7 cases of MC where Vedoluzimab was used to manage patients refractory to therapy (either steroid dependent, or failing biologic therapy). Methods Patients with MC managed with Vedolizumab were identified by soliciting practicing Gastroenterologists within Winnipeg at 3 health centres. A chart review was conducted to obtain pertinent information including patient demographics, symptoms, and medications previously trialed. Results Review of literature revealed 3 case reports, and 4 case series reporting on the use of Vedolizumab in MC. We identified 7 cases; 6 female, and a mean age at diagnosis of 50.7. Histologies included 3 lymphocytic, 2 collagenous, 1 developed from lymphocytic to collagenous over time, and 1 with evidence of both. 4 patients were on a biologic prior to initiating Vedolizumab with a mean duration of therapy of 24.25 months. Indications for initiating Vedolizumab included: 3 with steroid dependency, 3 Infliximab failures, and 1 with Adalimumab-associated hepatotoxicity. Mean disease duration prior to initiating Vedolizumab was 112.7 months. Number of stools pre-Vedolizumab were: 1–3 = 0, 4–6 = 2, 7–9 = 2, >/=10 = 3, compared to >6 months post-Vedolizumab: 1–3 = 5, 4–6 = 1, 7–9 = 1, >/=10 = 0. Symptoms pre-Vedolizumab compared to >6 months post-Vedolizumab included: 4 with urgency pre-Vedolizumab versus 1, 3 had incontinence versus 0, and 4 had nocturnal symptoms versus 0. Use of alternative medications included anti-diarrheals, oral 5-aminosalicylic acid, and immunomodulators. On average, patients tried 7.6 different treatments prior to starting Vedolizumab. 1 case is considered to have failed Vedolizumab due to increasing symptoms. Conclusions This multicentre case series is the first in Canada to assess patient characteristics and symptoms before and after Vedolizumab induction in persons with MC who are either steroid dependent or have failed a biologic. Our results demonstrate an overall improvement in symptoms when assessed >6 months after induction therapy. This review was limited in not having a symptom inventory/severity index completed at each clinic visit, resulting in a number of difficult-to-compare and incomplete data points. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".