MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213344449 · doi:10.7202/1034511ar

Réflexions sur les politiques ethniques du gouvernement fédéral canadien 1971-1985 et du gouvernement du Québec

2016· article· fr· W4213344449 on OpenAlex
Daniel Gay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Community Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir principalement des documents officiels des gouvernements canadien et québécois, l’auteur procède à une étude minutieuse de leur politique multiculturelle, tout en dégageant leurs similitudes et leurs différences. Il ressort de l’analyse que les politiques ethniques sont axées sur l’idée centrale que l’individu ne peut jouir de sa liberté qu’en autant qu’il n’est pas coupé de son ethnie. Ainsi, l’État, en garantissant la pleine existence de cette dernière, contribue également à l’épanouissement individuel. D’où la principale importance du pouvoir de l’État qui l’habilite à garantir la survie de l’ethnie comme celle de l’individu. Cependant, la politique fédérale du multiculturalisme et la politique québécoise de la convergence culturelle entraînent dans leur conceptualisation même l’assimilation aux groupes dominants. Enfin, si la politique multiculturelle est un élément non négligeable dans la construction de l’unité du Canada, il en est tout autrement pour le Québec qui cherche à sauvegarder sa particularité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it