MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4213347023 · doi:10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.280

Abstract 280: Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxygenation During CPR in Swine

2018· article· en· W4213347023 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey R. Gould, Michael Lick, Christopher L. Kaufman, Joshua W. Lampe, Annemarie Silver, P. Berger, Anja Metzger

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOxygenationCerebral blood flowAnesthesiaCerebral autoregulationCardiologyBlood flowCerebral perfusion pressureInternal medicineBlood pressureAutoregulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been used during cardiac arrest (CA) to non-invasively measure cerebral oxygenation. Studies have suggested that survival and neurological outcomes can be predicted using cerebral oxygenation, however, the physiology underlying cerebral oxygenation during CA is poorly understood. This exploratory study examined the behavior of cerebral blood flow and oxygenation in response to standard CPR (SCPR) and CPR with Active decompression and lift (ACD) and an impedance threshold device (ITD). Methods: Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced in eight domestic swine. Following six minutes of untreated VF, SCPR (100 cpm at 20% anterior-posterior distance) was performed for six minutes. ACD+ITD was performed for an additional six minutes at the same rate and depth as SCPR, but with an additional 20% anterior-posterior distance of active lift. Cerebral blood flow was measured via microspheres and cerebral oxygenation was measured using NIRS. Animals were classified as responders if cerebral oxygenation increased within two minutes of initiating SCPR. Cerebral oxygenation did not change or declined during SCPR in non-responders. Results: Six out of eight animals were classified as responders. Cerebral blood flow and oxygenation increased with ACD+ITD compared to SCPR in responders but failed to increase for non-responders. Cerebral blood flow and oxygenation were lower during baseline (BL) in non-responders (Figure). Conclusions: ACD+ITD appears to improve cerebral blood flow and oxygenation. Changes in cerebral oxygenation during CA appear to be associated with measured changes in cerebral blood flow. NIRS may be clinically useful in estimating oxygenation and blood flow during low blood flow states and monitoring physiological responses to different interventions. Failure of improvement in NIRS during CPR may predict poor outcomes and/or the need for additional interventions guided by NIRS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances→French-language works237,207→