Implementing Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP) for Children with Disabilities in Inclusive Schools: A Knowledge Translation Strategy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: To examine the effectiveness of PREP (Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation) knowledge translation (KT)-program on (a) change in practice behaviors and improved knowledge of school-based occupational therapists, and (b) participation of children with disabilities in inclusive education.Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed. Therapists (n = 39) completed a 30-hour program. Each therapist applied PREP intervention to one child (n = 39) aged 4-15 (Mean = 9.31, SD = 2.4). Therapists’ outcomes included: (a) knowledge of PREP evaluated using a clinical vignette, analyzed descriptively, (b) change in practice behavior measured by the Professional Evaluation and Reflection on Change Tool (PERFECT), analyzed thematically. Change in children’ participation pre- and post-KT-program and during follow-up was measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), analyzed using ANOVA.Results: Therapists acquired knowledge of PREP (vignette mean score 17.7/20). PERFECT revealed therapists’ self-perceived changes in practice: incorporating an environmental perspective, expanding partnerships, and redirecting focus on participation. Completing the KT-program was a primary enabler and reason for change. Children’s participation significantly improved post KT-program and during follow-up in both performance (p < 0.001) and satisfaction (p < 0.001).Conclusions. KT strategies, as illustrated in this study, accelerated the uptake of evidence-based interventions, minimizing existing ’know-do' gaps and promoting children’s health through participation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".