MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213370700 · doi:10.1093/geront/gnw162.320

HOPES AND FEARS FOR END OF LIFE AMONG LGBT OLDER ADULTS LIVING IN ONTARIO, CANADA

2016· article· en· W4213370700 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sean N. Halpin, David Rimland, Hannah L. F. Cooper, Theodore M. Johnson, Keith McInnes, Michael Ohl, Molly M. Perkins, Arne Stinchcombe, Katherine Kortes-Miller, Kimberley Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Gerontologist · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerontologyPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Older adults (>50 years) account for over half of Americans living with HIV. Within this population are a number of under researched, vulnerable groups, including aging women, who may have unique needs such as social support through organized religion. Focusing on pathways and barriers to social and spiritual support among older, heterosexual females with HIV, we conducted a collective case study of five females participating in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) at the Atlanta site. Data collection included semi-structured, face-to-face interviews (median duration= 103 minutes) and social network mapping. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. We used VACS survey data and data from medical records to provide context for the qualitative data. Participants had a median age of 52 years (range 50-72) and were mostly black (80%) all were Christian, participated in regular religious services, and indicated religion was very important. Within case analysis revealed variation in social support reflective of differences in partner status and community ties. Cross-case analysis showed that each of the five women received substantial social support and an outlet to God through their religious congregations-giving meaning and purpose to their lives. However, all participants were concerned that disclosure of their HIV status would result in excommunication from their religious congregations. Participants circumvented these fears by discussing poor health in terms of their less socially stigmatized physical diagnoses, (e.g., polyneuropathy) or by limiting their interaction with church members when ill. These results highlight an ongoing need to address HIV stigma in religious congregations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe GerontologistSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207