A219 AMINOTRANSFERASE IMPROVEMENTS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH FIBROSIS REGRESSION IN THE REGENERATE STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The interim analysis of the REGENERATE study showed obeticholic acid (OCA) 25 mg treatment significantly improved liver histology in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis. Elevations in aminotransferases are associated with adverse liver-related outcomes in NASH. Aims Here, we evaluate the utility of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) as markers of treatment response to OCA in patients with NASH. Methods Changes in ALT (upper limit of normal [ULN] = 55 U/L) and AST (ULN = 34 U/L) were assessed systematically at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months in 931 NASH patients with stage 2 or 3 fibrosis randomized 1:1:1 to placebo (PBO), OCA 10 mg, or OCA 25 mg in REGENERATE (intent-to-treat population). Least-square mean (LSM) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of percentage change from baseline in ALT and AST were analyzed using a mixed-effect repeated-measures model. Results Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across treatment arms: ALT 79±53 U/L; AST 58±36 U/L; 44% F2, 56% F3. Aminotransferase values were > ULN for ALT in 60% (7% > 3xULN), and for AST in 74% (9% > 3xULN) of patients. Rapid, progressive, and dose-dependent improvement in ALT and AST was seen across PBO, OCA 10 mg, and OCA 25 mg arms, which at Month 18 was: ALT LSM change (95% CI), respectively, -4.9% (-10.7–0.9), -23.2% (-28.9– -17.4) and -31.9% (-37.7– -26.1) and in AST, -8.7% (-12.1– -5.2), -13.4% (-16.8– -9.9), and -19.4 (-22.8– -15.9). ALT and AST LSM reductions in OCA arms vs PBO were seen regardless of patient ULN status at baseline. In all patients, ALT/AST reduction was associated with probability of fibrosis regression at Month 18, ranging from approximately 20%, 95% CI (14–27) to 45% (37–54) with any reduction in ALT (> 0%–100%) and between approximately 20%, 95% CI (25–38) to 43% (35–57) with any reduction in AST (> 0%–100%). Interestingly, even with increases of ≤ 40% in AST or ALT there was still a small probability of fibrosis regression (< 20%). Analysis of changes in ALT and AST in individual patients showed that more patients had improvements on OCA than PBO at Month 18 (FIG 1). Conclusions OCA resulted in consistent dose-dependent improvement of ALT and AST. Patients with reductions in ALT or AST were up to twice as likely to have fibrosis improvement than those whose ALT or AST increased. The REGENERATE study is ongoing and will continue through clinical outcomes for verification and description of clinical benefits of OCA in treatment of NASH. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".