MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CT abdomen only for active surveillance in patients with stage I germ cell tumor (GCT): A multi-institutional study.

2022· article· en· W4213383767 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hamed Ahmadi, Tarik Benidir, Ragheed Saoud, Lynn Anson‐Cartwright, Martin O’Malley, Scott E. Eggener, Robert J. Hamilton, Siamak Daneshmand

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePelvisAbdomenStage (stratigraphy)SeminomaRadiologyPopulationSurgeryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

410 Background: Active surveillance (AS) for stage I germ cell tumor (GCT) typically includes periodic imaging of chest, abdomen and pelvis. Efforts to modify the surveillance protocols aim to minimize radiation exposure in this young patient population. We report our multi-institutional effort to assess the effect of omitting CT pelvis. Methods: Using data from three major referral centers for GCT (University of Southern California, University of Toronto, and University of Chicago), all patients with stage I GCT who experienced recurrence on AS were selected. Clinicodemographic information including recurrence pattern (tumor marker (TM), imaging, physical exam (PE), or a combination of these) were collected. Bifurcation of the common iliac arteries was defined as the anatomic landmark between CT abdomen and pelvis. The location of recurrent nodal disease was determined accordingly. Results: A total of 270 patients were included. 122(45%) patients had non-seminomatous GCT (NSGCT). 17(6%) patients had history of cryptorchidism and 38 (14%) had history of scrotal/inguinal surgery. The median time to recurrence for seminoma and NSGCT was 16 months (IQR 8–27) and 6 months (IQR 4–13), respectively. The most common method for detecting recurrence was imaging-only (49%) followed by combination of TM and imaging (43%). A total of 43/270(16%) patients had pelvic/inguinal nodal recurrence (PNR). Prior hernia repair was significantly higher in patients with pelvic/inguinal nodal disease compared to their counterparts (19%vs2.5%;p=0.01). PNR was detectable only by imaging in 16/270(6%) patients. However, in 11/16(69%) patients, PNRe was either visible on CT abdomen cuts or there was simultaneous retroperitoneal recurrence. Overall, only 5/270(1.8%) patients (4 seminoma, 1 NSGCT) had PNR only detectable on CT pelvis. Conclusions: CT abdomen only, chest imaging, TM and PE detect majority of recurrences in stage I GCT and CT pelvis could be safely omitted during AS. Future modification in AS protocols of stage I GCT may be warranted.[Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicTesticular diseases and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207