MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213389182 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab049.229

A230 THE ROLE OF THE MICROBIOTA IN NOCICEPTOR DEVELOPMENT AND PAIN SENSITIVITY

2022· article· en· W4213389182 on OpenAlexaff
Nasser Abdullah, Manon Defaye, Ahmed Hassan, Mélissa Cuménal, Mircea Iftinca, Douglas Young, Christina Ohland, Antoine Dufour, Kyle E. McCoy, Christophe Altier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerbal Medicine Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNociceptorTRPV1Chronic painDysbiosisInflammationCapsaicinNociceptionSensitizationNeuroscienceGut floraMedicineImmunologyBiologyReceptorTransient receptor potential channelInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pain is the most common cause of disability in IBD. What causes inter-individual variability in chronic pain after successful treatment of inflammation remains elusive. We have shown that activation of TRPV1+ colonic nociceptors is essential for the establishment of persistent pain in DSS colitis. Nociceptor development coincides with microbial colonization, while early life dysbiosis can lead to visceral hypersensitivity in adulthood. Whether the microbiota dictates nociceptor development and pain susceptibility remains unknown. Here we test the hypothesis that the microbiota programs nociceptor specification during early development, rendering them more susceptible to sensitization later in life. We have identified the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) that senses bacterial-derived metabolites as a candidate target that orchestrates transcriptional regulation in nociceptors. Aims We investigated the developmental regulation of nociceptors by the microbiome and how it influences pain sensitivity. We will determine the effects of AHR activation on nociceptor lineage and function as well as the long term impact of AHR signaling on pain sensitivity. Methods We have developed a germ-free (GF) TRPV1-GFP reporter mouse that was used to phenotype and visualise TRPV1+ nociceptors in the absence of a microbiota. We will isolate TRPV1+ neurons by FACS to identify genes that are under the control of the microbiota and to characterise the phosphoproteome of TRPV1+ nociceptors in GF conditions. Finally, we will investigate the role of AHR signaling in nociceptors both acutely and during development. Results We showed a reduction in thermal pain threshold and a reduction in capsaicin test responses in GF mice. The number and size of DRG neurons was unchanged in GF mice. Examination of molecular markers for peptidergic (CGRP) and non-peptidergic (IB4) neurons did not show a difference. Finally, there was no difference in the expression of TRPV1, suggesting post-translational modification of the channel. In cultured DRG neurons, we found a decrease in capsaicin induced action potentials and a decrease in the amplitude of the capsaicin response in GF mice. Using RNAscope, we showed that TRPV1+ neurons express AHR. Conclusions Our results highlight the importance of bacterial composition in regulating the development of nociceptors and pain sensitivity in adulthood. Furthermore, we are the first to demonstrate the expression of AHR in sensory neurons. These findings point to a role of the microbiota in programming nociceptors during development. My work will advance our understanding of the role of commensal bacteria in regulating pain and could lead to recommendations for the treatment of neonates in early life to reduce their risk of developing chronic pain later in life. Funding Agencies CAG, CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicHerbal Medicine Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207