El bien jur´ídicamente tutelado en el trans`porte aéreo. / The legally tutored property in air transportation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El crecimiento del transporte aéreo internacional ha determinado que las cuestiones relacionadas con el retraso sean las que más a menudo afectan a los usuarios del servicio. La legislación de los Estados debe ser consistente y coherente con los Tratados Internacionales respecto de la responsabilidad de las aerolíneas establecida por el Convenio de Montreal de 1999. La escasa regulación de protección al consumidor en el transporte aéreo internacional de pasajeros en Latinoamérica es dispar entre los países y ajenas a las normas de carácter internacional que regulan los derechos de protección al consumidor. No debe haber discusión alguna entre la seguridad y la protección de los derechos de los pasajeros para exonerar a las aerolíneas de responsabilidad por retrasos o cancelaciones causados por circunstancias de seguridad. Ello en razón que el bien jurídicamente protegido es la seguridad de vuelo. Los progresos que se logren deben en materia de protección al consumidor no deben afectar indebidamente a las aerolíneas, de cuya prosperidad también depende la prestación de un servicio adecuado para el consumidor. Existen un sinnúmero de circunstancias y procesos que escapan al control de las aerolíneas, no pareciendo razonable que, en estos casos, deban responder civilmente. Adoptar una posición contraria solamente contribuye a generar costos adicionales y a incrementar el costo del servicio, dificultado su acceso para aquellos usuarios quienes presenten mayor sensibilidad a la elasticidad de la demanda. ABSTRACT The growth of international air transport has determined that delay issues are the ones that most often affect service users. The legislation of the States must be consistent and coherent with the International Treaties regarding the responsibility of airlines established by the Montreal Convention of 1999. The scant regulation of consumer protection in international passenger air transport in Latin America is uneven among the countries. countries and outside the international standards that regulate consumer protection rights. There should be no discussion between safety and the protection of passenger rights to exonerate airlines from liability for delays or cancellations caused by safety circumstances. This is because the legally protected asset is flight safety. Progress in consumer protection must not unduly affect airlines, on whose prosperity the provision of adequate consumer service also depends. There are countless circumstances and processes that are beyond the control of the airlines, and it does not seem reasonable that, in these cases, they should respond civilly. Adopting a contrary position only contributes to generating additional costs and increasing the cost of the service, making access difficult for those users who are more sensitive to the elasticity of demand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".