Trans-dimensional gravity and magnetic joint inversion for 3-D earth models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Studying 3-D subsurface structure based on spatial data is an important application for geophysical inversions. However, major limitations exist for conventional regularized inversion when applied to potential-field data. For example, global regularization parameters can mask model features that may be important for interpretation. In addition, 3-D inversions are typically based on data acquired in 2-D at the Earth’s surface. Such data may contain significant spatial error correlations in 2-D due to the choice of spatial sampling, acquisition geometry, ambient noise and model assumptions. These correlations can cause trade-offs with spatial resolution and should be accounted for. However, correlations are often ignored, particularly 2-D correlations in spatial data, such as potential field data recorded on the Earth’s surface. Non-linear Bayesian methods can address these shortcomings and we present a new hierarchical model for 2-D correlated errors. Nonetheless, limitations also exist. For example, non-linear Bayesian estimation requires numerical integration with a considerable computational burden to collect a posterior ensemble of models. For 3-D applications, this cost can be prohibitive. This paper presents a non-linear Bayesian inversion with trans-dimensional (trans-D) partitioning of space by a hierarchy of Voronoi nodes and planes (VP), and trans-D estimation of the data noise covariance matrix. The addition of planes permits the introduction of prior information which reduces non-uniqueness. The covariance matrix estimation uses a trans-D autoregressive (AR) noise model to quantify correlated noise on 2-D potential-field data. We address computational cost by wavelet compression in the forward problem and by basing susceptibility on an empirical relationship with density contrast. The method is applied to simulated data and field data from off-shore Abu Dhabi. With simulated data, we demonstrate that subsurface structures are well-resolved with the trans-D model that applies hierarchical VP partitioning. In addition, the model locally adapts based on data information without requiring regularization. The method is also successful in reducing 2-D error correlation via trans-D AR models in 2-D. From field data, the inversion efficiently resolves basement topography and two distinct salt diapirs with a parsimonious and data-driven parametrization. Results show a considerable reduction in 2-D spatial correlations of field data using the proposed trans-D AR model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".