MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213431829 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202226011034

Measuring the <sup>15</sup>O(<i>α</i>,<i>γ</i>)<sup>19</sup>Ne Reaction in Type I X-ray Bursts using the GADGET II TPC: Software

2022· article· en· W4213431829 on OpenAlexaff
Ruchi Mahajan, Andrew Adams, J. M. Allmond, H. Alvarez Pol, E. Argo, Y. Ayyad, D. W. Bardayan, D. Bazin, Tamas Budner, A. Chen, K. A. Chipps, B. Davids, J. Dopfer, M. Friedman, H. O. U. Fynbo, R. Grzywacz, J. José, J. F. Liang, S. D. Pain, D. Pérez–Loureiro, E. C. Pollacco, A. Psaltis, Saiprasad Ravishankar, A. M. Rogers, L. Schaedig, L. J. Sun, J. Surbrook, T. Wheeler, L. E. Weghorn, C. Wrede

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesTRIUMFMcMaster University
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsUpgradeGadgetPhysicsDetectorSoftwareNuclear physicsProtonComputer scienceOperating systemOpticsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

15O(α,γ)19Ne is regarded as one of the most important thermonuclear reactions in type I X-ray bursts. For studying the properties of the key resonance in this reaction using β decay, the existing Proton Detector component of the Gaseous Detector with Germanium Tagging (GADGET) assembly is being upgraded to operate as a time projection chamber (TPC) at FRIB. This upgrade includes the associated hardware as well as software and this paper mainly focusses on the software upgrade. The full detector set up is simulated using the ATTPCROOTv 2 data analysis framework for 20Mg and 241Am.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207