MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213431983 · doi:10.4159/9780674039889-001

Acknowledgments

2000· book-chapter· en· W4213431983 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard University Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTel Aviv UniversityEuropean University InstituteYork UniversityHebrew University of JerusalemTemple UniversityUniversity of VirginiaUniversity of MichiganMcGill UniversityUniversity of ChicagoHarvard UniversityNorthwestern UniversityRussell Sage FoundationPrinceton UniversityUniversité de ParisNational Science FoundationJohn Simon Guggenheim Memorial FoundationCity University of New YorkUniversity of PennsylvaniaSage Foundation
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE WRITING of acknowledgments marks the true end of a project.It provides an occasion to repress the difficulties, to remember the moments of ecstasy, and to express appreciation for the good deeds that made it all possible.First, I want to thank the 150 men who were interviewed for this book.They were trusting enough to tell me how they see things, and I hope that my analysis does not betray them.Their remarkable openness helped me to understand the conditions underlying their views.Many also showed great humanity, which I found very inspiring.Without people like these men, qualitative sociology would simply not exist and I would be deprived of one of the pleasures of my life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it