MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213432303 · doi:10.1109/wsc52266.2021.9715334

Spatial Models and Masks in Indoor Analysis for the Spread of COVID-19

2021· article· en· W4213432303 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control and Ventilation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Face masksComputer scienceFormalism (music)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)RespiratorEnvironmental scienceVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Materials scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face masks have been shown to slow or stop the spread of airborne COVID-19 droplets and aerosols. There is an apparent lack of research examining the effect of different types of masks used at the same time, and their impact on the spread of viral particles in a spatial sense. We introduce a rapid prototype model to overcome the issues in the available research using the Cell-DEVS formalism. We also build scenarios for the model to examine the effectiveness of all types of masks and respirators recommended by the World Health Organization on the spread of viral particles in an indoor environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it