Autoproducción de los óleos alquídicos: formulación y propiedades
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alkyd oils are a fairly recent type of paints, similar to traditional oils, yet with a faster drying time. Just because of its relative novelty, no pictorial techniques and materials handbook can be found which could show an artist how to produce their own alkyd oils, which indeed does happen with acrylics or traditional oils. The present study introduces a research that opens doors for an economic and accessible binder by means of which the artist can produce their own alkyd oil paintings. To this end, a wide sample of alkyd resins has been selected and they have been tested through several laboratory analyses and pictorial tests until a combination of alkyd resin and linseed oil, most perfectly suited to the objective of the research, has been found. Once this binder was found, it has been studied in depth by using it to produce paints with a wide range of pigments, and explaining both their individual formulation and their characteristics of Body and viscosity, Gloss, Texture, Flexibility and Drying. Finally, a palette with the most suitable pigments for self-producing alkyd oils has been proposed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".