MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213446039 · doi:10.1145/3474556

Traffic Classification in Underwater Networks Using SDN and Data-Driven Hybrid Metaheuristics

2022· article· en· W4213446039 on OpenAlexaff
Buddhadeb Pradhan, Gautam Srivastava, Diptendu Sinha Roy, K. Hemant Kumar Reddy, Jerry Chun‐Wei Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Sensor Networks · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceSoftware-defined networkingArtificial neural networkMachine learningOverhead (engineering)Particle swarm optimizationController (irrigation)Data miningArtificial intelligenceDistributed computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software-Defined Networks ( SDNs ), with their segregated data and control planes, has proved to be capable of managing massive amounts of data by leveraging distributed information available across the network for informed decision-making at the network controller. However, with the proliferation of next-generation, real-time Internet of Things ( IoT ) applications that vary greatly in terms of data frequency and volumes, data traffic classification can substantially assist SDN controllers toward efficient routing and traffic engineering decisions. Existing works on network classification are limited by their application-centric nature, thus overlooking the key criterion for real-time IoT applications, namely, Quality of Service ( QoS ). In this article, we focus on augmenting SDN controllers’ decision-making capacity and Underwater Sensor Networks with machine learning algorithms to achieve real-time, QoS-aware, network traffic classification. Three classifiers, namely, Feed-forward Neural Network, Naïve Bayes, and Logistics Regression have been employed with a novel Artificial Neural Network and Particle Swarm Optimization hybridization scheme by carrying first- and second-order stability analysis for performance improvement of these classifiers. In short, the proposed framework exploits optimization algorithms and semi-supervised machine learning ( ML ) for precise traffic classification while keeping communication overhead between controller and switches minimal. Results obtained from real-life datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Sensor NetworksSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207