Effects of Systemic Rehabilitation Nursing Combined with WeChat Publicity and Education on the Early Cognitive Function and Living Quality of the Patients with Cerebral Arterial Thrombosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the effects of systemic rehabilitation nursing combined with WeChat publicity and education on the early cognitive function and living quality of the patients with cerebral arterial thrombosis. Methods. Ninety-two patients with cerebral arterial thrombosis treated in our hospital (January 2019–January 2021) were selected as the research objects and equably divided into control group and study group according to their nursing model, with 46 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing, while the study group received systemic rehabilitation nursing combined with WeChat publicity and education based on the routine nursing. The early cognitive functions, living quality, and other observation indexes of the two groups after nursing were compared, and the intervention effects were evaluated. Results. No statistical difference in the general data was observed between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). The NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) scores, Fugl-Meyer scores, and MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) scores of the two groups after nursing were all better than those before nursing, and the NIHSS score, Fugl-Meyer score, and MoCA score of the study group after nursing were better than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Compared with the control group, the study group had a remarkably higher excellent and good rate of daily living ability after nursing ( P < 0.05 ) and prominently higher SIS (Sensory Index Score) after nursing ( P < 0.05 ). The SIS included the scores of emotion, strength, ADL (activities of daily living), memory and thinking, hand function, communication and participation as well as the total score. Conclusion. The systemic rehabilitation nursing combined with WeChat publicity and education can effectively reduce the degree of neurological deficit of the patients with cerebral arterial thrombosis, improve their early cognitive function and motor function, and increase their daily living ability and prognostic living quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".