MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4213457847 · doi:10.3390/su14052586

A Cost-Effective Solution for Non-Convex Economic Load Dispatch Problems in Power Systems Using Slime Mould Algorithm

2022· article· en· W4213457847 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersTaif University
KeywordsHeuristicMathematical optimizationEconomic dispatchElectric power systemRegular polygonPower (physics)AlgorithmComputer scienceElectric powerSMA*Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) is a newly designed meat-heuristic search that mimics the nature of slime mould during the oscillation phase. This is demonstrated in a unique mathematical formulation that utilizes adjustable weights to influence the sequence of both negative and positive propagation waves to develop a method to link food supply with intensive exploration capacity and exploitation affinity. The study shows the usage of the SM algorithm to solve a non-convex and cost-effective Load Dispatch Problem (ELD) in an electric power system. The effectiveness of SMA is investigated for single area economic load dispatch on large-, medium-, and small-scale power systems, with 3-, 5-, 6-, 10-, 13-, 15-, 20-, 38-, and 40-unit test systems, and the results are substantiated by finding the difference between other well-known meta-heuristic algorithms. The SMA is more efficient than other standard, heuristic, and meta-heuristic search strategies in granting extremely ambitious outputs according to the comparison records.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it