A Cost-Effective Solution for Non-Convex Economic Load Dispatch Problems in Power Systems Using Slime Mould Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) is a newly designed meat-heuristic search that mimics the nature of slime mould during the oscillation phase. This is demonstrated in a unique mathematical formulation that utilizes adjustable weights to influence the sequence of both negative and positive propagation waves to develop a method to link food supply with intensive exploration capacity and exploitation affinity. The study shows the usage of the SM algorithm to solve a non-convex and cost-effective Load Dispatch Problem (ELD) in an electric power system. The effectiveness of SMA is investigated for single area economic load dispatch on large-, medium-, and small-scale power systems, with 3-, 5-, 6-, 10-, 13-, 15-, 20-, 38-, and 40-unit test systems, and the results are substantiated by finding the difference between other well-known meta-heuristic algorithms. The SMA is more efficient than other standard, heuristic, and meta-heuristic search strategies in granting extremely ambitious outputs according to the comparison records.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".