MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214478519 · doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a15034

Estimating Functions

2005· other· en· W4214478519 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony F. Desmond, V. P. Godambe

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Biostatistics · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverdispersionInferenceUnificationBiostatisticsEconometricsComputer scienceStatistical inferenceParametric statisticsStatisticsSampling (signal processing)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceCount dataProgramming languagePoisson distributionMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aim of this article is twofold. First, we demonstrate that the methodology of estimating functions produces a unification and extensions of approaches to statistical modeling and inference, both parametric and semiparametric. Secondly, we illustrate via selected examples, how this methodology applies in biostatistics. We have limited our discussion, here, to case–control studies, prospective and retrospective sampling, and overdispersion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.100
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.100
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of BiostatisticsSame topicStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceFrench-language works237,207