Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueAdvances in Social Work · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity at AlbanyCalifornia State University, East BayUniversity at BuffaloCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUtah Valley UniversityTexas Woman's UniversityAuburn University at MontgomeryStony Brook UniversityAustralian Centre for Advanced PhotovoltaicsStockton UniversityUniversity of South DakotaU.S. Public Health ServiceSkidmore CollegeIllinois State UniversityMontclair State UniversityCalifornia State University San MarcosTemple UniversitySaint Louis UniversityUniversity of Louisiana MonroeNorth Carolina Central UniversityUniversity of EssexUniversity of GreenwichMassey UniversityUniversity of DenverFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityFordham UniversitySouthern Connecticut State UniversityKennesaw State UniversityAppalachian State UniversityWestern Kentucky UniversityUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonUniversity of MiamiUniversity of South CarolinaEast Carolina UniversityUniversity of South FloridaJames Madison UniversityWashington University in St. LouisUniversity of PittsburghCalifornia State University, SacramentoVirginia Commonwealth UniversityFlorida State UniversityMiddle Tennessee State UniversityTulane UniversityArizona State UniversityYeshiva UniversityBall State UniversityUniversity of MontevalloUniversity of ConnecticutCollege of Staten Island, City University of New YorkUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignWestern Carolina UniversityColorado State UniversityBoise State UniversityUniversity of MissouriUniversity of Southern MaineAdelphi UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaMichigan State UniversityLamar UniversityNorthern Kentucky UniversityAuburn UniversitySalisbury UniversityState University of New YorkUniversity of OklahomaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBrigham Young UniversityBoston CollegeUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoWest Chester UniversityLoyola University ChicagoCity University of New YorkCalifornia State University, FresnoEastern Kentucky UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillWayne State UniversityWestern Michigan UniversityTexas Christian UniversityUniversity of TorontoMorgan State UniversityPortland State UniversityEast Tennessee State UniversityAustin Peay State UniversityOhio State UniversityColorado Mesa UniversityUniversity of Texas Rio Grande ValleyUniversity of WashingtonWestfield State UniversitySimmons College
KeywordsTheme (computing)Social workSociologyVariety (cybernetics)Work (physics)Social justiceCriminologyPublic relationsSocial distanceEliteMental healthPandemicPolitical scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyMedicineLawEngineering
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexIn the Fall 2021 issue of Advances in Social Work, we are pleased to present 16 full-length papers written by 30 authors from different regions of the U.S. including Puerto Rico as well as from Ghana. An underlying theme of many of these contributions is the opportunity brought about through various struggles: patriarchal systems leading to innovative women entrepreneurs, social distancing measures spawning new ways of learning virtually and new ways of practicing social work, and mental health challenges exposed among elite athletes leading to new frontiers of practice. The variety of social work contributions to wellness, advocacy, and social justice seem to be ever-expanding. Interestingly, despite the trend toward multiple-authored papers over time, 7 of the papers in this issue are solo-authored--perhaps an artifact of the pandemic. Each paper is introduced briefly below, followed by our annual recognition of reviewers for Advances in Social Work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.444 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
