MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214509405 · doi:10.4000/books.eua.3843

Pirandello : un auteur toujours vivant sur les scènes contemporaines

2019· book-chapter· fr· W4214509405 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Barbuscia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuteur theoryArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2017, nous avons fêté les 150 ans de la naissance de Luigi Pirandello et pourtant ses œuvres sont toujours vivantes. Elles continuent à nous interroger, elles ne connaissent ni l’usure du temps, ni les frontières. Elles rencontrent nos contemporains en brouillant sans cesse le réel et la mémoire, la fiction et le vécu… Ses œuvres sont encore aujourd’hui une fantastique source d’inspiration pour des auteurs qui ont décidé de « fouiller » aussi bien dans les œuvres que dans la vie de Pirand...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207