PENCAPAIAN TUJUAN PROGRAM KAMPUNG TEMATIK BERBASIS PENGARUSUTAMAAN GENDER DI KAMPUNG SENTRA BANDENG
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saat ini Kota Semarang menghadapi permasalahan kawasan kumuh (112,49 Ha) dan pengentasan kemiskinan (4,14%). Program kampung tematik bertujuan meningkatkan kualitas fisik lingkungan kumuh dan mengurangi penduduk miskin. Pelaksanaan program kampung tematik sebaiknya menerapkan strategi pengarusutamaan gender, sesuai dengan Instruksi Presiden Nomor 9 tahun 2000 tentang Pengarusutamaan Gender dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Artikel ini menjelaskan apakah pelaksanaan program kampung tematik telah menerapkan pengarusutamaan gender. Penelitian dilakukan secara kuantitatif dengan teknik analisis skoring dan deskriptif. Indikator pengarusutamaan gender yang digunakan yaitu akses, partisipasi, manfaat, dan kontrol. Hasil analisis menemukan bahwa skor pencapaian tujuan program cukup baik (1,89 atau setara dengan 63%). Maka, dapat disimpulkan tujuan pelaksanaan program yang sudah tercapai yaitu peningkatan kualitas fisik dan yang belum tercapai adalah pengentasan kemiskinan. Hal ini dikarenakan bantuan sumber daya yang diperoleh peserta program belum merata dan tidak terdapat tempat pemasaran bersama sehingga peserta sulit mengembangkan usaha pengolahan bandeng.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it