MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214522745 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2022.0026

Grande forme by Renaud Jean

2022· article· en· W4214522745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ann Williams

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)DehumanizationHuman beingDystopiaPsychicApathyArt historyHumanitiesHistorySociologyArtPsychologyHumanityLawLiteraturePolitical scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Grande forme by Renaud Jean Ann Williams Jean, Renaud. Grande forme. Boréal, 2021 ISBN 978-2-7646-2640-5. Pp. 138. Look! That’s le ministère de la Vie intérieure, with its aquatic façade. And over there, that’s the Entrepôt, that warehouse from which the products that feed society’s desires are expedited by employees (human) or by the robots that make fewer mistakes. And there? That’s the Numériseur, the vast pyramid where personal documents are reviewed and commented upon by their owners, allowing a digital version of themselves to be left to posterity—as is their responsibility. And there’s the Déchiqueteur, where the papers, concrete traces of a life, are destroyed, no longer needed. This is the world through which Quebec author Renaud Jean gives a glimpse of how psychological, technological, economic, and social trends evolving today could easily become twisted into a fiendish future. It is not surprising that a self-aware man living in this dystopian future, a digitized, organized, and dehumanized future, is in pain. What is worthy of note is that the author has created a complex narrator who sees the dysfunction around him and reacts with oh-so-human inconsistency. His emotions range from apathy as his partner’s parents move in and promptly appropriate the apartment to fury as he suffers the indignities of his employment at the Entrepôt where the bell signals another order to fill and the electronic bracelet he wears sends a shock if he is not following “suggestions.” In the world of Grande forme, there is an unstated norm. One should find a way to be “just fine.” Life should be fulfilling. But, as the narrator says in the first sentence: “Ce n’est pas la grande forme” (9). Later, evicted from his apartment for reasons unclear, he says it again (48). Then he is living in a closet in a cousin’s apartment, watching his possessions disappear, sold on the online Marché for rent. Kicked out again, he is in a shelter and will take the sole concrete evidence of his life that remains, a trunk of papers, to the Numériseur to contribute himself, in digitized form, to the future. A laudable effort, but one that elicits the same comment as before (73). And then it is another phase of life, where the Entrepôt, an employee camp, and a suicide attempt lead to a slight change in his self-evaluation: “Ce n’est vraiment pas la grande forme” (111). Alas, this is not the end of the downward spiral, but what makes this grim tale bearable is the humanity with which Renaud Jean infuses the narrator. This latter sees, and we see, that his life is a relentless series of traps, but he survives (as do we) thanks to incessant tongue-in-cheek observations and dark humor. The questions posed by this foray into the future and the responses of one individual give us pause. When he asks, “Qu’ai-je fait de ma vie?” (76), we, too, are being asked to think carefully about the directions our lives are taking. When the vagaries of the outside world are in control, all we can do, it would seem, is hope to remain human. [End Page 248] Ann Williams Metropolitan State University of Denver (CO) Copyright © 2022 American Association of Teachers of French

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207