MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214530902 · doi:10.1155/2022/7717075

Curve Fitting Algorithm-Based Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Image for Evaluating the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Neurological Function in Patients Undergoing Brain Tumor Surgery

2022· article· en· W4214530902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Programming · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAlgorithmUltrasoundSalineDexmedetomidineAnesthesiaInternal medicineRadiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. The study aimed to explore the influence of dexmedetomidine (Dex) guided by ultrasonic contrast on postoperative cognitive function, serum nerve injury factors, inflammatory response, and blood glucose in patients undergoing intracerebral tumor resection through curve fitting algorithm. Methods. 80 patients who underwent tumor resection were selected and randomly rolled into control (Ctrl) group and Dex group, with 40 in each. Then, patients in the Dex group received 0.4 μg/kg⋅h Dex, and patients in Ctrl received the same amount of normal saline. Both groups were diagnosed with benign or malignant tumors by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) based on time-intensity curve (TIC) before surgery. Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination (CCSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used to assess the cognitive function 1 day before and 3 days after the operation, and the ELISA method was used to detect levels of nerve damage-related factors and inflammation factor. Finally, the fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were detected at the same time. Results. In contrast with benign lesions, the AUC, MTT, and PI of malignant lesions were obviously reduced ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ), while TP was obviously increased ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ). The postoperative CCSE and MoCA scores of the Dex group were obviously higher than Ctrl ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ). In contrast with the Ctrl, the CCSE and MoCA scores in the Dex group increased obviously after 3 days ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ). In addition, the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the Dex group was obviously reduced ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ). Besides, levels of S100β, NSE, and GFAP were obviously reduced in the Dex group 1 day after surgery ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ), while levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were obviously reduced ( <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <mi>P</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ), and returned to the level of Ctrl 3 days after surgery. There was no obvious difference in FBG at each time point between the two. Conclusion. CEUS based on curve fitting algorithm is effective on nursing treatment of intracranial tumors. Dex can obviously improve POCD and reduce levels of serum nerve injury factors and inflammatory factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it