A Novel Pathological Voice Identification Technique through Simulated Cochlear Implant Processing Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a pathological voice identification system employing signal processing techniques through cochlear implant models. The fundamentals of the biological process for speech perception are investigated to develop this technique. Two cochlear implant models are considered in this work: one uses a conventional bank of bandpass filters, and the other one uses a bank of optimized gammatone filters. The critical center frequencies of those filters are selected to mimic the human cochlear vibration patterns caused by audio signals. The proposed system processes the speech samples and applies a CNN for final pathological voice identification. The results show that the two proposed models adopting bandpass and gammatone filterbanks can discriminate the pathological voices from healthy ones, resulting in F1 scores of 77.6% and 78.7%, respectively, with speech samples. The obtained results of this work are also compared with those of other related published works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it