MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214546596 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v24i3.a09

Fuel Cell-Based High-Gain Boost Converter Fed Single-Phase Multi-level Inverter Controlled by FPGA controller

2021· article· en· W4214546596 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Manikanta Swamy Dasari, Venkatesan Mani, Subbarao Mopidevi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoost converterInverterTotal harmonic distortionField-programmable gate arrayPulse-width modulationComputer sciencePower (physics)Settling timeThree-phaseĆuk converterBuck–boost converterController (irrigation)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringComputer hardwarePhysicsControl engineeringStep response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For grid-connected applications, Multi-level Inverters (MLI) are mostly used, similarly to join the various RES to the grid as well as to satisfy the load demand MLIs are mostly preferred. This article presents a fuel cell-based high-gain boost converter with a single-phase five-level inverter controlled by CB-PWM techniques. A fuel cell produces a very less amount of power so to boost-up the fuel cell power to the essential power level with the help of a high-gain boost converter. The boost converter produces the required DC output power and that power is a converter to required AC power by using a single-phase five-level inverter. The MLI switches are controlled with the help of MC-PWM techniques and observe the inverter behavior in terms of THD, output ripples, and settling time. The entire work is done in MATLAB/Simulink tool as well as design a small prototype model by using the FPGA board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207