MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4214553660 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs22161910

Fits in Pregnant Women with Previously Controlled Epilepsy: A Cross Sectional Study

2022· article· en· W4214553660 on OpenAlexaff
Safia Gul, Imran Khawaja, Asiya Gul, Asad Khawaja

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpilepsyPregnancyEpoch (astronomy)ObstetricsEclampsiaCross-sectional studyIncidence (geometry)Obstetrics and gynaecologyFamily historyPediatricsSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aim: Pregnant women with epilepsy require stability in maternal fits and antiepileptic drugs have potentially adverse effects in developing fetuses. Hypoxemia and blunt trauma cause convulsive fits which are treacherous to both maternal and fetus. Limited data available regarding frequency of fits in pregnant women with previously controlled epilepsy. The present study was carried out to evaluate the frequency of fits in pregnant women with previously controlled epilepsy. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 70 pregnant women with a previous history of epilepsy in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad and Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindifrom January 2021 to December 2021. The incidence of Fits during pregnancy was compared through a peripartum period (epoch 1) and during the postpartum period (epoch 2). Non-pregnant epilepsy women were enrolled as controls and were followed for 18 months period. A higher frequency of Fits was the prime outcome in epoch 1 compared to epoch 2. Administrated drugs such as antiepileptic drugs doses were compared. Results: A total of 70 pregnant and 60 controls women with epilepsy were enrolled. Out of 70, about 60 had a history of previous fits or Fits. The prevalence of fits was significantly higher during epoch 1 whereas in epoch 2, about 21% had Fits and 23% in control had Fits (Odd ratio: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.49-1.57). Of those 60, 22 (36.7%) of the pregnant subjects recruited had a history of eclampsia-related fits. An antiepileptic drug dose during pregnancy was changed in 69% of pregnant women and 29% in control (odd ratios; 6.41; 95% CI, 3.79-10.63). Conclusion: Our study found that the percentage of epilepsy diagnosed women had a higher frequency of fits during pregnancy compared to the postpartum period was comparable to the control group (non-pregnant) women. During comparable time periods, pregnant women experienced more changes in antiepileptic drug doses than non-pregnant women. Keywords: Fits, epilepsy, pregnancy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies→French-language works237,207→