MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4214557138 · doi:10.3138/chr.92.3.547

Reviews

2011· article· en· W4214557138 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt historyAdventureEmpireClassicsAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lana Wylie, Perceptions of Cuba: Canadian and American Policies in Comparative Perspective, reviewed by Karen Dubinsky Alvin Finkel, Sarah Carter, and Peter Fortna, eds., The West and Beyond: New Perspectives on an Imagined Region, reviewed by R. Douglas Francis Jerry Lockett, Captain James Cook in Atlantic Canada: The Adventurer & Map Maker's Formative Years, reviewed by Jeffers Lennox James Jackson, The Riot That Never Was: The Military Shooting of Three Montrealers in 1832 and the Official Cover-up, reviewed by Dan Horner James W. Macnutt, Building for Democracy: The History and Architecture of the Legislative Buildings of Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and New Brunswick, reviewed by Geoffrey Simmins Shurlee Swain and Margot Hillel, Child, Nation, Race and Empire: Child Rescue Discourse, England, Canada and Australia, 1850–1915, reviewed by Xiaobei Chen Jean Morrison, Labour Pains: Thunder Bay's Working Class in Canada's Wheat Boom Era, reviewed by Nathan Smith Ken Leyton-Brown, The Practice of Execution in Canada, reviewed by Carolyn Strange Eric McGeer, Words of Valediction and Remembrance: Canadian Epitaphs of the Second World War, reviewed by Steve Marti Serge Marc Durflinger, Veterans with a Vision: Canada's War Blinded in Peace and War, reviewed by Nathan Smith

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4280.366

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207