A Coordinated Multi-Energy Trading Framework for Strategic Hydrogen Provider in Electricity and Hydrogen Markets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a multi-energy trading framework for a hybrid-renewable-to-H2 provider (HP) to coordinate the interaction and trading of electricity and H2 while promoting the efficient accommodation of renewable energy resources (RESs). In this framework, the HP can harvest hybrid RESs for green H2 production based on electrochemical effects of biomass electrolysis, and procure stacked profits from both the electricity and H2 markets by the flexibility of electricity-H2 conversion. A Vickrey auction-based pricing mechanism is developed to determine the trading price and quantity of H2 while eliciting truthful offers and bids in a competitive H2 market. Then, a single-leader-multiple-follower Stackelberg game with an iterative solution algorithm is formulated to capture the interactions between the H2 auctioneer and hydrogen fueling stations (HFSs) for achieving the win-win goal. Furthermore, a hybrid-renewable-to-H2 production and control method is proposed for the HP to raise the production efficiency of green H2 and suppress large fluctuations in electrolysis current caused by RES uncertainties. Comparative studies have validated the superiority of the proposed methodology on economic performance and RES accommodation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".