MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4214569281 · doi:10.31857/s2076673422010120

БАЛАНС ЛЬДА В СЕВЕРНОМ ЛЕДОВИТОМ ОКЕАНЕ В 1979-2019 ГГ. (ПО ДАННЫМ МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЯ)

2022· article· ru· W4214569281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
И. Е. Фролов, M. Kulakov, Kirill Filchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Ice and Snow · 2022
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of numerical experiments on the model of joint water and ice circulation for the period from September 1979 to December 2019, aimed at studying the interannual variability of the ice balance in the Arctic Ocean, are considered. The results obtained made it possible to analyze the geographical features of the processes of ice formation and melting in the Arctic Ocean and to identify key areas that determine the volume of ice in the ocean. It is established that the main quantity of ice is formed in waters of the Siberian seas, and the most intense melting occurs in the North European Basin, where the ice transported by the Transpolar Current through the Fram Strait enters the relatively warm water of the Greenland Sea, heated by the North Atlantic Current. The formation of the absolute minimum of ice coverage in 2012 was promoted by the anomalous position of the anticyclonic hydrological cycle – much closer to the Canadian coast. This resulted in the fact that only a small part of the ice formed in the Siberian seas was involved into a weakened circulation, while most of the ice in the stream of the Transpolar Current was transported through the Fram Strait to the Greenland Sea. Statistical analysis of the results of numerical experiments demonstrated that the trend towards a decrease in the volume of ice in the Arctic Ocean is primarily determined by the global warming, and dynamic forcing exerts significant effect on local extremes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Ice and Snow→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→