MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4214574600 · doi:10.1101/2022.02.28.22271612

Influence of landscape patterns on the exposure of LASV across diverse regions within the Republic of Guinea

2022· preprint· en· W4214574600 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stéphanie Longet, Cristina Leggio, Joseph Akoi Boré, Tom Tipton, Yper Hall, Fara Raymond Koundouno, Stephanie Key, Hilary Bower, Tapan Bhattacharyya, N’Faly Magassouba, Stephan Günther, Ana-Maria Henao-Restrapo, Jeremy S. Rossman, Mandy Kader Kondé, Kimberly Fornace, Miles W. Carroll

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHamilton Health Sciences FoundationConsortium of International Agricultural Research CentersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftRoyal SocietyWellcome Trust
KeywordsLassa feverLassa virusTransmission (telecommunications)GeographyVirologyEnvironmental healthImmunologyBiologyMedicineVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lassa fever virus (LASV) is the causative agent of Lassa fever, a disease endemic in West Africa. Exploring the relationships between environmental factors and LASV transmission across ecologically diverse regions can provide crucial information for the design of appropriate interventions and disease monitoring. We measured LASV-specific IgG seropositivity in 1286 sera collected in Coastal and Forested Guinea. Our results showed that exposure to LASV was heterogenous between the sites. The LASV IgG seropositivity was 11.9% (95% CI 9.7-14.5) in Coastal site, while it was 59.6% (95% CI 55.5-63.5) in Forested region. Interestingly, exposure was significantly associated with age, with seropositivity increasing with age in the Coastal site. Finally, we also found significant associations between exposure risk to LASV and landscape fragmentation in Coastal and Forested regions. This study may help to define the regions with an increased exposure risk to LASV where a close surveillance of LASV circulation is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research→French-language works237,207→